Now in closed beta.Book a demo to get started.
Use cases

Add a missing gate: typecheck, lint, or a coverage floor

Pipeline speed and cost|The work pauses for the plan, and the review bar is raised so that smaller suggestions also block the merge, not only serious findings.

A check the team runs locally and the pipeline does not, added so it stops being optional.

The ticket

Add a missing verification gate to the pipeline.

Acceptance criteria

  • The gate runs on every pull request
  • A deliberately seeded violation fails the build
  • Existing violations are fixed before the gate is enforced
  • The gate runs early enough to fail fast

What lands as proof

A seeded violation failing the build, which is what makes it a gate rather than a report.

Why teams defer it

  • Turning it on with existing violations blocks everybody, so the cleanup has to come first.
  • It edits pipeline files, which stops the run for a human to approve by design.

Questions

What does the agent actually change?
The ticket is scoped to one outcome: add a missing verification gate to the pipeline. Work that serves that outcome is in scope, and anything outside it is left for a separate ticket, so the pull request stays reviewable.
How do I know the work is done?
The pull request carries the evidence, not only the diff. Here that means approved on the plan, then the gate fails on a seeded violation, so a reviewer can confirm the result without reproducing the work locally.
How much oversight does this need?
The run stops for the plan, and the review bar is raised afterwards so that smaller suggestions block the merge too, not only serious findings.

Ready to put the fleet to work?

Contact us for a demo with an expert.